NORTH AMERICAN CRANE WORKING GROUP
HOME ABOUT NEWS WORKSHOPS PUBLICATIONS AWARDS JOIN CONTACT

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CRANE WORKSHOP

Volume 11 : < Previous article   Next article >

Title:
EVALUATING PROPAGATION METHOD PERFORMANCE OVER TIME WITH BAYESIAN UPDATING: AN APPLICATION TO INCUBATOR TESTING


Date: 2010


Authors:
SARAH J. CONVERSE, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
JANE N. CHANDLER, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
GLENN H. OLSEN, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
CHARLES C. SHAFER, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center

DOWNLOAD
DOWNLOAD COMPLETE ARTICLE


Citation:
Converse, S. J., J. N. Chandler, G. H. Olsen, and C. C. Shafer. 2010. Evaluating propagation method performance over time with Bayesian updating: an application to incubator testing. Proceedings of the North American Crane Workshop 11:110-117.

Abstract:
In captive-rearing programs, small sample sizes can limit the quality of information on performance of propagation methods. Bayesian updating can be used to increase information on method performance over time. We demonstrate an application to incubator testing at USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. A new type of incubator was purchased for use in the whooping crane (Grus americana) propagation program, which produces birds for release. We tested the new incubator for reliability, using sandhill crane (G. canadensis) eggs as surrogates. We determined that the new incubator should result in hatching rates no more than 5% lower than the available incubators, with 95% confidence, before it would be used to incubate whooping crane eggs. In 2007, 5 healthy chicks hatched from 12 eggs in the new incubator, and 2 hatched from 5 in an available incubator, for a median posterior difference of <1%, but with a large 95% credible interval (−41%, 43%). In 2008, we implemented a double-blind evaluation method, where a veterinarian determined whether eggs produced chicks that, at hatching, had no apparent health problems that would impede future release. We used the 2007 estimates as priors in the 2008 analysis. In 2008, 7 normal chicks hatched from 15 eggs in the new incubator, and 11 hatched from 15 in an available incubator, for a median posterior difference of 19%, with 95% credible interval (−8%, 44%). The increased sample size has increased our understanding of incubator performance. While additional data will be collected, at this time the new incubator does not appear adequate for use with whooping crane eggs.

The North American Crane Working Group provides free and open access to articles in Proceedings of the North American Crane Workshop. No additional permission is required for unrestricted use, distribution, or reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work here is properly cited. Complete Proceedings are also available for download or purchase.

© 2010 North American Crane Working Group